As the women’s movement developed in the late 70’s, the
concept of Patriarchy emerged and was
latched upon to influence the development of subsequent Domestic Violence programmes. Patriarchy is the idea that the male has
special privilege holding supreme authority over all women and children in
every aspect of society.
This heavily affected the work that was taking place
around Domestic Violence. According to
many programme providers, “women and children are vulnerable to violence
because of their unequal social, economic and political status in society.”
This had led to millions of pounds being ploughed into
funding support for women and children, but little support for men. To support the claims for funding, you will
commonly hear that 1 in 4 women will experience Domestic Violence in their
lifeline. An historic statistic from a
limited sample is also often put forward : 95% of all domestic violence victims
are female (see previous blog to see how this is discredited.)
However, the real picture has been suppressed. Many professionals have known the truth for
decades but haven’t been allowed to speak out.
Domestic Violence is not a result of Patriarchy and should not be a
battleground for militant feminists.
Erin Pizzey, founder of the first Women’s Refuge is on
record as saying that of the first 100 women to enter the Chiswick Refuge in
1971, 62 were as violent if not more so than the partners they were ‘escaping.’
Erin Pizzey was then ostracized by the feminist movement because her findings completely contradicted the
ideology that they were wanting to promote.
Along with Erin, others who tried to re-address the misinformation being
spread received death threats and some even had their cars bombed.
Partner Abuse
State of Knowledge Project (PASK) 2012 reveals the following:
The majority of Domestic Violence incidents is mutual –
that is where both parties fight each other.
Population
Surveys : 57.9%
Community
Samples 59.6%
School
& College samples 51.9%
Female
oriented clinical samples 72.3%
These
figures, over 40 years after Chiswick refuge was founded are still fairly
consistent with Erin Pizzey’s findings.
Between 51.9% - 59.6% are mutual
Domestic Violence situations. The big
surprise is the figure of 72.3% which comes from clinical samples from Lesbian
relationships. These fighting sisters
can’t blame Patriarchy for the violence in their relationships. !!
So
what about scenarios where there is no reciprocal violence? PASK also asks that question.
The
figures for Male assaults against female (non-mutual IPV) are:
Population
Surveys : 13.8%
Community
Samples 17.5%
School
& College samples 16.2%
Perhaps
surprisingly the figures for Female assaults against male (non-mutual IPV) are:
Population
Surveys : 28.3%
Community
Samples 22.9%
School
& College samples 31.9%
Notice
how woman are twice as likely to attack a male partner, than a male assault a
woman without any reciprocal action.
Domestic
Violence is a complex issue but will never be addressed properly until there is
acknowledge that women can be as aggressive ( in some cases even more so) than
men.
The
approaches to tackle Domestic Violence based on the ideas of patriarchy have
and are still failing because they are flawed and not dealing with the real
issues.
Yes. The official BCS stats suggest figures of male targeted DV of around 40%. However, those working in the field accept the true figure is much higher as men do not report abuse against them and, in many cases, do not recognise it because of their cultural conditioning.
ReplyDeleteThe thing is...
It doesn't matter what the stats say. The first hurdle to overcome is getting people to care about men in the first place -- to see them as human being who can be hurt, and not "just a man".
Ηello! Would you mind if I share your blog ωith mу fаcebook group?
ReplyDeleteThere's a lot of people that I think would reаlly apprecіate your content.
Рlease let me κnow. Thanκs
my web page :: website maintenance plan agreement
Please feel free to share with your Facebook group :)
ReplyDelete