What I did discover was a report following a review by the
Crown Prosecution Service that such allegations are extremely rare:
Appearing today in my newsfeed was a story about a
businesswoman who brutally murdered her 8 year old son. Bizarrely, her defence argued that the reason
she killed was due to some accusations she made against two ex-partners. There was no evidence to substantiate such
claims. In other words she was making
false allegations against two men
Some women’s organisations will grudgingly acknowledge that
men can claim to experience Domestic Violence, but will then claim that a male
victim is really a perpetrator. There is no evidence to support this claim,
rather it is another smokescreen to hide the real truth.
Women, as well as men, can be violent in relationships. This is nothing new. Back in 1971, Erin Pizzey opened the first
Refuge (Shelter) and discovered that of the first 100 women to enter, 60% were
as violent or even more violent than the men they were claiming to flee from.
Pizzey has been the subject of death threats and boycotts
because of her research into the claim that most domestic violence is
reciprocal, and that women are equally as capable of violence as men. Pizzey
has said that the threats were from militant feminists.
Such claims have been consistent with academic studies taken
all throughout the last 40 years including PASK 2012
Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project (PASK) 2012 reveals
the following:
The majority of Domestic Violence incidents is mutual – that
is where both parties fight each other.
Population Surveys : 57.9%
Community Samples 59.6%
School & College samples 51.9%
Female oriented clinical samples 72.3%
Between 51.9% - 59.6% are mutual Domestic Violence
situations. The big surprise is the figure of 72.3% which comes from clinical
samples from Lesbian relationships.
In other words, the highest incidents of domestic violence
have been found in lesbian relationships!!1
So what about scenarios where there is no reciprocal
violence? PASK also asks that question.
The figures for Male assaults against female (non-mutual
IPV) are:
Population Surveys : 13.8%
Community Samples 17.5%
School & College samples 16.2%
Perhaps surprisingly the figures for Female assaults against
male (non-mutual IPV) are:
Population Surveys : 28.3%
Community Samples 22.9%
School & College samples 31.9%
Notice how woman are twice as likely to attack a male
partner, than a male assault a woman without any reciprocal action.
And yet, society is still by large disbelieving about women aggressors.
I feel that many women remain in denial about their violent
behaviour towards partners or ex-partners.
My ex certainly is even now. Our
children have challenged her about the assaults on me that THEY witnessed. They saw her hit me, pour hot drinks over me
and smash dinner plates (with food still on them) over my head. And yet, she wasn’t violent! She will admit to being a little clumsy and
dropping things, but remains in denial about more severe deliberate violent
acts. I have also spoken with women who
have eventually admitted hitting their partner.
For men when they hit a partner, there is no hiding place
when reported or witnessed. Some women
though, remain in denial. They believe that
they can strike their partner because the partner is male therefore it doesn’t
really hurt or their emotional/hormonal condition allows them to behave in such
a way etc. They think that because
society doesn’t want to recognise that women can act in such fashion that they
can deny they have anger issues or violent tendencies. After all, no man will want to claim that
their female partner is abusive to them, will they. And even if the male is brave enough to speak
out, who will believe him? They can deny
it and remain in denial about their own problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment